| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | Friday, May 21, 2010 |
| Contact: Leigh Fifelski | 517-999-3646 |
LANSING – CMS Energy shareholders are sending a clear signal they have deep concerns about a proposed Bay County coal plant and the risk it poses to the company’s financial stability after a significant percentage of shareholders voted today in support of proposals from two investors calling on the utility giant to disclose risks associated with its coal ash disposal and cut greenhouse gas emissions.
While the two proposals were not endorsed at the shareholders’ meeting in Jackson, the strong support for the shareholder proposals are a sign of investors’ deep concern that CMS Energy’s poor environmental performance and continuing investment in coal are putting shareholder values at risk.
“CMS Energy is wasting an opportunity to be not just a true energy leader, but also more profitable down the road so it can continue creating Michigan jobs and providing Michigan energy to families and businesses,” said Margaret Weber, a member of Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and shareholder proxy. “We will not give up. We will continue the fight to make CMS Energy – our company – a leader in clean energy investments and clean energy jobs, not a dinosaur from the coal age.”
During the meeting CMS Energy Shareholder Margaret Weber delivered a large bundle of Michigan petition signatures to now former CEO David Joos and current CEO John Russel telling him that “these 8,000+ Michiganders are asking CMS Energy – all of us in this room – to invest in renewable energy and energy efficiency, not another dirty, expensive, and unnecessary coal plant. They hope that CMS Energy will focus on energy efficiency and clean energy as lower cost options that will create good jobs and help them keep paying their bills.
Weber asked “As one of these 8,000 Michigan residents, I would like to know what the rate increase will be to pay for this new coal plant and when you will provide investors with an analysis of the rate impact of this new coal plant, including potential customer defaults and loss of customers?”
Citing that major credit ratings agencies across the nation have warned that new coal plants are expensive and likely to be plagued by long term regulatory and financial problems, shareholder Peter Every asked management “In the face of all these risks, wouldn’t it be wise to stop spending investor money on developing a risky, expensive, and unnecessary coal plant, and instead replace our old and inefficient coal plants with energy efficiency and clean energy?
Weber also raised concern about the re-election of board member Richard Gabrys, who also sits on the Massey Energy board of directors. Massey Energy is a coal company with a long history of violating the law, both in safety and in environmental compliance. Those violations are believed to have played a part in the April explosion that killed 29 miners.
“CMS Energy shareholders sent a message to their company’s management that making further investments in old coal technology is a bad decision,” said Peter Every, CEMS Energy shareholder and Livonia resident. “Not only has Consumers Energy CEO David Joos refused to listen to the people of Michigan for years, he’s also refused to heed the warning signals from the financial industry about the risks of building new coal plants. Shareholders demand change and they deserve a company that is financially responsible.”
Two CMS Energy investors – the Office of the Comptroller of New York City and the As You Sow Foundation – submitted the shareholder proposals. The shareholder proposals call for CMS to:
- Plan for a more expensive carbon future by adopting quantitative goals for reducing its total greenhouse gas emissions and reporting to shareholders on these plans
- Disclose all potential risks associated with toxic coal ash disposal and to disclose steps the company is taking to reduce exposure to these risks.
A similar coal ash shareholder resolution filed with MDU Resources recently received 25.6 percent of the vote in favor of increased transparency on this key environmental issue – high enough for the company chairman to agree to shareholder demands at its annual general meeting. Investors in Southern Company, which dropped its own plans for a new coal plant in Mississippi last month, have also filed similar resolutions.