<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://progressmichigan.org">
  <channel>
    <title>CL Blog</title>
    <link>http://progressmichigan.org/page/community/blog_rss/climatelaws/html</link>
    <description>Updates on climate laws and policy</description>
                        <item>
            <title>An Administrative Climate Change Blueprint</title>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;cross-posted at &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatelaws.org/main.html&quot; title=&quot;Climate Laws&quot;&gt;ClimateLaws.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under the neo-classic pen name, Justinian, several yet to be revealed policy and climate experts have released a &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcqm4999_1f7h4xjgm#sdfootnote4anc&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;blueprint of strategies&lt;/a&gt; for the incoming administration to consider with regards to climate change.&amp;nbsp; The lynchpin of these tactics is that they can all be undertaken &lt;a href=&quot;http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/22/more-cool-energy-prescriptions-for-obama/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;without the need&lt;/a&gt; for immediate congressional action.&amp;nbsp; Like the Roman Emperor Justinian&amp;rsquo;s attempts to bring Rome out of the Dark Ages with, among other things, a complete revision of the Roman law code &amp;ndash; the authors&amp;rsquo; proposals offer a dramatic administrative shift in US priorities for climate change.  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;plain&quot;&gt;While some of the recommendations are fairly well known, some are wonkish administrative priority setting such as strategies within federal agencies that will permit a far greater amount of environmental policy changes to successfully navigate the myriad of interagency hurdles they often face.&amp;nbsp; Two of the more public and well known recommendations include having the US join a binding international agreement on climate change, and granting California&amp;rsquo;s exemption to EPA regulation of auto emissions essentially letting that state and 18 others raise emissions standards on automobiles.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;  Some other suggestions include....more after the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatelaws.org/main.html&quot; title=&quot;Climate Laws&quot;&gt;jump&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <link>http://progressmichigan.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/BJ9</link>
            <comments>http://progressmichigan.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/BJ9/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:18:26 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://progressmichigan.org/page/community/post/climatelaws/BJ9</guid>
            <dc:creator>User from East Lansing, MI</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>User from East Lansing, MI</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>0</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://progressmichigan.org/page/community/comment_rss/BJ9/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>